|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 10, 2010 0:08:10 GMT -5
ArticleSo Nikon released the AF-S NIKKOR 24mm f/1.4G ED and the AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR. Both make me want them very badly. I mean, no aberrations almost on the 24mm!? THAT'S INSANE! And godly. Oh so very godly. <3 Unfortunately, there is no way my wallet can afford either anytime soon. :C But they're an exciting prospect to save for, definitely!
|
|
|
|
Post by ScottWood on Feb 10, 2010 1:27:23 GMT -5
I have seen some sample shots from both, they look amazing. I am far more interested in upgrading to a full frame body before new glass though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 10, 2010 9:00:52 GMT -5
I can definitely understand those feelings! Man, someone needs to win the lottery and share the wealth.
|
|
|
|
Post by ŋєт™ on Feb 10, 2010 10:45:43 GMT -5
*Drool*
|
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 12, 2010 10:46:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ScottWood on Feb 12, 2010 14:02:34 GMT -5
On a serious note though, I certainly see the appeal of the 24mm 1.4 lens. I don't quite get the need for the 16-35 f4 lens though, unless they are just trying to give people a medium prices wide zoom. Nikon already has an amazing 14-24 2.8 lens that is considered a gold standard lens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 12, 2010 14:38:54 GMT -5
You're probably right about the zoom. Nikon probably wants something that appeals to everyone. That, and there are some people out there who need to have every type of lens they can get their hand on, so they might figure the more variety they have, the better they can do in the camera-brand-choice wars.
|
|
|
|
Post by milahenner on Jun 21, 2012 4:53:11 GMT -5
Can i use this lense to a cannon E560 camera, and whats the zooming distance of this lense. Thanks.
|
|
